2011 April | Lakshmi Capital
Comments Off

Short-Term “Blowoff Top” For Silver?

Posted April 27th, 2011 in Commodities, Silver by Tom
This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The RealFinance Commodity Analyst.  Originally sent to subscribers over the weekend, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  If you would like to see samples of the newsletter or subscribe to have it delivered each weekend in addition to ad-hoc trading recommendations mid-week, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

Silver experienced another amazing week, advancing from 42.155 to 45.175 on the week (and up another $1.5 in Asian trading at the time of this writing).  Even more impressive than the gain in silver has been the volume behind the advance.  The below chart shows the price of silver, with the aggregate volume on silver futures contracts below the chart.

Silver_Price_and_Volume_Chart

As can be seen, volume on silver futures has exploded with the recent price gains in silver, a very bullish technical sign.  Usually, when volume on a security increases with a significant move in price, the conviction behind the move is thought to be strong because of how many people are participating.  Conversely, when market participants view a large move in a security with falling volume, it is a sign of an imminent reversal.

The average volume on silver futures has increased from 73k contracts on April 1st to 117k contracts as of April 21st.  This is an absolutely huge increase.  The average volume on silver futures has increased 59.7% in the same time span that silver itself has increased 22.22%.  The amazing increase in breadth behind this move is truly striking, and indicates the strong likelihood of further gains.  However, even more amazing is the lack of participation of Managed Money (hedge funds, commodity funds, pension funds, etc.) in silver’s recent strength.

This Week’s Commitment of Traders Report

The below chart shows silver’s price in gray and Managed Money net longs in green.

Silver_Price_vs._Managed_Money_Net_Long_Chart

As can be seen, Managed Money has cut its net long position by 13.34% in the same time span that silver itself has rallied 22%.  This indicates that silver is actually rallying in spite of futures speculators, not because of them.

In fact, Managed Money short positions in silver are actually quite high.  The below chart shows total Managed Money shorts since January 2009.

Silver_Managed_Money_Total_Shorts_Chart

It appears that the number of traders trying to “call a top” in the silver market is growing very quickly.  As can be seen, the number of Managed Money short contracts has more than doubled since the end of March.  This type of action is exactly what a silver bull wants to see, silver prices climbing in the face of greatly increased short selling pressure.  As these short sellers are forced to cover, the price of silver will only go higher.

The lack of participation by Managed Money continues to perplex us, as we believed Managed Money would come around and join the uptrend much sooner.  However, as we have stated recently, the buying pressure of physical and ETF buyers of silver has greatly outweighed any skittishness on the part of Managed Money.

The below chart shows price and volume on the SLV.

SLV_ETF_Price_and_Volume_Chart

As can be seen, volume on the SLV has increased greatly in the past 2 weeks as silver has started to soar yet again.  Even with the SLV almost 22% above its 50 day moving average, the breadth of the silver rally has been astounding.

As we mentioned last week, the increase in silver holdings by physical buyers and the ETFs is a massively bullish development for the silver market.  So-called “retail” participants favor the SLV and silver coins to silver futures because of their relative ease and familiarity.  In most financial markets, increased participation of retail investors is a death signal to a large rally, as small mom and pop investors are the last to get in.  However, in silver’s case, the hoarding of silver by physical and ETF buyers takes the metal out of world supply, further constricting supply tightness for investment demand, and thereby boosting prices.  As more and more silver comes out of supply, the amount left for industrial demand and absolutely booming investment demand is decreased, and a physical shortage commences.

The other reason to be bullish about greater retail participation in silver is that retail investors are by and large not leveraged.  Although it is possible to buy the SLV on margin, the leverage afforded even the most daring margin investor is nothing compared to the futures market.  The physical silver market obviously has no ability to leverage, as silver dealers accept only cash for coins/bullion.  Since the greatest participants in the silver market currently (physical and ETF holders) are implementing their position with very little to no leverage, they will not be forced to liquidate even if prices correct severely.  This type of staying power should prove supportive if and when silver pulls back.

While Managed Money has stood mostly on the sidelines, if and when Managed Money decides to increase net longs, look out.  Silver may increase by another $10-20/oz in a matter of weeks or even days.

Trade Recommendation

With the huge amount that the silver market has rallied recently, silver could easily experience a correction down to the 50 day moving average or below.  Considering the 50 day moving average for silver is almost $10 below where silver futures currently trade, that would be a $50,000 loss per contract for a futures traders (hardly a small loss).  On the other hand, silver market internals all look wildly bullish, so a bullish strategy with less downside than an outright long position seems to be prudent.

We recommend purchasing the July 50 calls on silver for $1.616, or $8,080 per contract.  The maximum loss on this trade would be the amount paid for the option, while the potential gain is unlimited.  The trade would be profitable upon expiration (June 27) if silver is trading above 51.616.  Since increased Managed Money participation as well as short covering by those looking to pick a top in the silver market could vault silver much higher, we believe the risk/reward ratio of this trade is highly attractive.

Given the silver market’s volatility and the chance that it could correct violently, traders should be also be ready to capitalize on any correction.  An example would be to sell the December 30 put on silver if prices correct severely.  While the $30/ounce level is high on a historical basis, we view it as an attractive entry point if an investor has the capability to hold silver over the next 2-3 years.  If silver undergoes a correction, selling this type of protection should be a profitable trade, as nervous investors will pay handsome premiums to buy protection.  With implied volatility on the December 30 put currently at a very high level of 48.6%, investors will be willing to pay dearly for put protection if silver experiences any headwinds.

If desiring to effect these same trades through the SLV, an investor could buy the July 50 calls on the SLV for $2.  On a correction, the January 2012 30 puts could be sold.

 

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

Featured in Forbes: Lakshmi Capital MD Calls For Silver “Blowoff Top”

Posted April 26th, 2011 in Commodities, Forbes, Silver by Tom

Make sure to checkout the latest Forbes coverage from Lakshmi Capital Managing Director Ananthan Thangavel -

Lakshmi Capital Managing Director Ananthan Thangavel Calls Silver “Blowoff Top” for Forbes

Comments Off

The Long Term Case For Precious Metals

Posted April 19th, 2011 in Commodities, Gold, Palladium, Platinum, Silver by Tom

This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The RealFinance Commodity Analyst.  These posts will be a few days delayed and only include a small portion of the newsletter, if you would like to have the entire content delivered over the weekend, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

As usual, precious metals markets have received plenty of attention recently.  While many market prognosticators are calling for an end to the gold “bubble,” we believe that we are still in the early stages of the bull market in gold due to overwhelmingly bullish fundamentals.

The following chart shows the price of gold  in yellow against the size of the Fed’s balance sheet in red since the year 2000.  The chart has been normalized for percentage.

3- Gold Price vs Size of Fed Balance Sheet S 2000 Chart

The reason why the Fed’s balance sheet is an important metric to track against the price of gold is because as the Fed’s balance sheet grows, the likelihood of the US government monetizing its debt (aka printing dollars to pay back debt) increases.  Throughout the history of time, any government that has been as indebted as the US currently is has had to finance the debt by printing money, at least in part.  Obviously, creating money out of thin air to pay back debts is a highly inflationary and currency debasing activity.  The gold market is reacting to the increased likelihood of such an event before its actual occurrence.

As can be seen, the price of gold has risen 375% since 2000, while the Fed’s balance sheet has increased 354% in size.  When viewing the price of gold in this context, it is very difficult to claim that gold is in any sort of bubble.  As investors lose confidence in the government’s ability to make interest and principal payments on our debt, they increasingly turn to gold as a store of value.  While gold has no industrial or commercial use outside of jewelry, it has been a store of wealth for thousands of years, and today’s environment is no different.  While it may be “irrational” to own gold under the premise that it does not pay any yield and it does not have industrial demand to support its price, gold’s status as an alternative to paper currency is so unquestioned that central banks hold massive amounts of it, and emerging market central banks are buying more.

To further illustrate gold’s relationship to government debt levels, the following chart shows gold in yellow and total US public debt outstanding in white.

4-Gold Price vs US Public Debt Outstanding

As can be seen, while gold may appear to be rising parabolically, so is US public debt.  This incredible increase in public debt means that inflation is becoming more and more likely.

An argument I have also been hearing frequently as of late is that gold is “overvalued.”  My question is compared to what?  While stocks have some very loose boundaries as to valuation (i.e. there are usually far fewer willing buyers of a stock at a 100 P/E than a 10 P/E), gold has no such ceiling.  Furthermore, when a commodity such as crude oil rises too much, consumers use less; this phenomenon is known as demand destruction.  However, since all of the demand for gold is comprised of investment demand, demand for gold will not decrease solely because it has gone up in price.  In fact, it may actually increase at some point as momentum gains behind the price of gold and investors late to the party pile in.

In this manner, precious metals (and commodities as an asset class on some level) are a momentum trade.  As long as governments remain fiscally irresponsible and over-indebted, precious metals will continue to rise in price.  As there is no way to know exactly how inflationary these steps will be, and when inflation will peak, putting a price target on gold and silver is an exercise in futility.  The only aspect of precious metals prices an analyst can place a reasonable probability on is direction, not price.

Viewing the same argument from the reverse angle, if an investor expected a recession or deflation in the near future, the sale of gold would be a highly favorable strategy.  However, with the renowned willingness of central bankers around the world (most notably Ben Bernanke) to print money at the slightest hint of deflation, our view remains that the risk is to the side of inflation and not deflation.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

Despite Rush, Story On Silver Continues To Strengthen

Posted April 19th, 2011 in Commodities, Silver by Tom

This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The RealFinance Commodity Analyst.  These posts will be a few days delayed and only include a small portion of the newsletter, if you would like to have the entire content delivered over the weekend, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

Silver continued its extraordinary run last week, closing the week at 42.57.  Even more astounding than how fast it is rising is the extent to which futures speculators are decreasing their bullish bets.  The below chart shows the price of silver in gray, Managed Money net longs in green, and Producer net shorts in blue.

6-Silver Price vs Managed Money Longs Net Producer Shorts Chart

As can be seen, the price of silver has actually rallied in spite of speculators rather than because of them.  As we posited last week, silver’s recent gains can be attributed to investors in physical silver bullion/coins as well as silver ETFs.  Buyers silver in physical or ETF form are taking silver out of world supply and hoarding the metal, further increasing supply tightness for other investors and thereby driving the price of silver up.

With Managed Money net longs standing at ~27k contracts, the Managed Money net long position is more than 20,000 contracts lower than the all-time high set on 9/28/2010 of 48k contracts.  If and when Managed Money starts to increase their net long position, the price of silver could absolutely skyrocket.

Trade Recommendation

While we usually prefer to be a net option seller, silver’s current position significantly above its moving averages leaves it susceptible to a pullback.  Even if it is only a temporary correction, a pullback to the 50 day moving average for silver could leave an investor down $40,000 per contract.  Such a scenario seems very risky to recommend an outright long futures position.

Instead, we recommend buying the July 45-50 call spread on silver futures.  As of 4/15, an investor could purchase the July 45 call for 1.711 and sell the July 50 call for 0.75, so the trade could be put on for a net debit of .961, or $4,805 per contract.

The trade would be profitable as long as silver is above 45.961 upon expiration, June 28th.  The maximum risk of the trade would be the amount debited, or $4,805 per contract.  The maximum gain would be $20,195 per contract; the risk reward ratio is about 1:4, which we view as attractive.

If an investor wished to have a longer time frame on the trade with a slightly lower payout, he could purchase the September 45-50 call spread instead.  If purchased for about 1.3, this trade would be risking $6,500 for a profit of $18,500.  Instead of expiring on June 28th, this trade would expire on August 25th.

These trades can also be affected via the SLV, using the 45-50 strike prices, and the July or October expirations.  The July 45-50 call spread could be purchased for about $1 per contract, meaning an investor would pay about $100 for a maximum profit of $400.  The October 45-50 call spread could be purchased for $1.33 per contract, meaning an investor would pay $133 for a maximum profit of $377 if SLV closes above 50 on October 21.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

What We Think Of Gold Post University of Texas Futures Delivery

Posted April 19th, 2011 in Commodities, Gold by Tom

This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The RealFinance Commodity Analyst.  These posts will be a few days delayed and only include a small portion of the newsletter, if you would like to have the entire content delivered over the weekend, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

Over the weekend, an announcement was made that the University of Texas endowment fund had decided to take delivery of $1 billion worth of gold.  This was an absolutely huge development on multiple fronts.

First, the UT endowment fund’s gold purchase was a radical deviation from the standard institutional portfolio, the possibility of which we have surmised for some time.  Since UT has about $20 billion in assets, a $1 billion gold allocation would indicate 5% of their assets in gold.  The standard institutional allocation to gold is 1%, a 5% allocation is a huge increase.  If (or in our opinion, when) other institutions adopt a similar stance, the price of gold will skyrocket.

Second, the endowment’s purchase of this large an amount of gold gives a huge vote of confidence to gold and precious metals as an investment.  For the past few years, financial media has lined up “experts” to tell us all about how gold is an irrational and poor investment, including figures as large as Warren Buffett’s right hand man, Charlie Munger.  Well, the UT endowment fund is neither dumb, nor stupid, and it helps that they are not poor.  They are well-funded institutional investors who are making a tactical investment decision, not a short-term trade.  As Kyle Bass, the hedge fund manager who advised UT to purchase the gold, explained, the gold was purchased as a hedge against money-printing and currency debasement worldwide.

The UT fund is not a charlatan investor such as a hedge fund.  They are purchasing gold on its merits as a long-term, fundamental investment.  As other institutional investors witness such a large and respected fund invest in gold, others’ resolve to increase investments in gold will be solidified.  Since gold only comprises .7% of the world’s financial assets currently, it is massively underowned by institutions, and UT’s purchase could be the catalyst to finally bring institutions to the table in a large way.

Finally, the endowment’s purchase of gold was of physical bullion.  While we do not advocate physical bullion purchases for individual investors, UT’s choice of gold ownership through physical bullion rather than the GLD or other bullion alternative shows that they are purchasing gold as a long-term investment.  Since the costs of owning bullion compared to the GLD are relatively high (vault rental, markup premium on purchase/sale), UT’s decision to buy bullion indicates they are measuring their holding period for gold in years, if not indefinitely.

As you can probably tell, we believe UT’s gold purchase is massively bullish for gold going forward, if only for the reasons of validation of our existing theories.  As other endowments and pension funds gain confidence in buying precious metals as investments, precious metal prices will skyrocket.

This Week’s Commitment of Traders Report

This week’s COT report shows that gold futures speculators actually reduced their bullish bets on the metal even as the price advanced to a fresh record.  The below chart shows gold in yellow and Managed Money longs in white.

5-Gold Price vs. Managed Money Longs Chart

As can be seen, gold has continued its bull market without the help of increased Managed Money long participation.  Physical buyers such as UT are fueling gold’s rise while futures speculators continue to approach gold’s rise with a bit of caution.  As Managed Money regains confidence to push their net long exposure back to all-time high levels and beyond, the price of gold will appreciate considerably.

Trade Recommendation

We continue to advocate long futures positions in gold.  With gold breaking above key resistance at the 1440 level, the current rise in prices could be sustained for quite some time before undergoing another correction.  Given how many times gold bumped up against the 1420-1440 level without successfully breaking through, its recent breakout could be the confirmation many traders were looking for to renew bullish bets.

For our simplest trade recommendation in quite some time, we would recommend purchasing the June gold futures contract at 1486, or the GLD at 145.51.  If gold drops, we would advocate aggressively adding to long positions.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.