Comments Off

Weekly Market Update- Trading Energy in Elevated Markets

Posted November 20th, 2011 in Australian Dollar, Commodities, Copper, Crude Oil, Equities, Forex by debojit

This post is featured from The Commodity Analyst newsletter.  Originally sent to subscribers Tuesday November 15, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  For details and samples of the newsletter, see here: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

The past week saw sideways, albeit volatile, movement of risk assets. While last Wednesday was a large selloff, the indices made back almost all of what they lost on Thursday and Friday, with the euro and Australian dollar recovering as well. Despite the seemingly lackluster action in equities and risk assets, fixed-income market fundamentals continued to deteriorate, and we believe a collapse in asset prices could be imminent.

The following charts show the CRB Raw Industrial index and the GSCI Total Return index.

As can be seen, the breakout of the GSCI index has hardly been confirmed by the CRB RIND.  While the CRB RIND has at least slowed its pace of decline, it still remains within a quarter of a percent from yearly lows, while the GSCI index has rallied magnificently since October 4th.  As we have indicated before, this continues to signal a preponderance of speculation on a recovery rather than a real recovery.  Given that the CRB RIND rebounded well before equities themselves bottomed in the 2010 summer correction as well as the 2008-2009 bear market, we believe the CRB RIND’s stubbornness in turning upwards indicates a continued fall in aggregate demand that is afflicting developed markets, not a simple lack of liquidity that the ECB and Europeans would have us believe.  On that note, let us turn to our now weekly practice of dissecting the latest news (or lack thereof) out of Europe.

Europe

The ECB had to again buy sovereign bonds in the secondary market this week to calm investor fears about Italy’s insolvency.  However, the more bonds the ECB buys, the less liquidity there is in the sovereign market and the less confidence investors have in the sovereigns.  Shown below are charts of the Italian and Spanish 10 year bonds.

As can be seen, Italian yields went absolutely parabolic on Wednesday of last week, rising to an astonishing 7.5% before ECB buying on Thursday and Friday drove them down to 6.5%.  However, yields rose back up to 6.7% today as the ECB stepped away.  Interestingly, while the Italian bonds at least showed a respite from selling for 2 days, the Spanish bonds did not.

As many have surmised, speculators and hedgers alike will move from country to country, much too fast for the ECB to keep up.  Even though the ECB was able to somewhat calm Italian yields (for a whopping 48 hours), investors simply moved to shorting Spanish bonds.  In essence, shorting Greek, Irish and Portuguese bonds is no different than shorting Spanish, Italian or even French bonds.  All of these countries suffer from the same problems: lack of growth, massively bloated financial system and overindebtedness on the sovereign, corporate and individual levels.  To top all of it off, none of the Eurozone countries can print its own currency and monetize its debt.  The only difference between a France, Italy or Spain at this point is what stage of the crisis they are in.  Indeed, even German bonds will likely come into question at some point if the ECB maintains their “virgin” stance.

At this point, most every investor, economist and analyst expects the ECB to print money, and therefore save the world economy.  However, the market is getting far too ahead of itself here.  As long as the status quo in the equity markets persist, the ECB will not be nearly motivated enough to embark on such a departure from their sacred covenants.  We know this from the daily, deliberate statements by ECB officials that they will absolutely not monetize Europe’s debts.  It will take a renewed deflationary crisis to get the ECB to finally move off their hardline stance, and we are nowhere near this point.

Today’s news that Germany has approved legislation to allow countries to exit the euro, as well as Fisher’s statements that US growth remains strong enough to discourage further easing attempts show that regulators and politicians are clueless as to the environment we are entering.  While QE out of the US and Europe will eventually happen, they absolutely will not while markets remain at these elevated levels.  If and when the S&P 500 reaches around 1000 or the euro-dollar cross goes below 1.20 or so, the respective central banks may be inspired to act, but there is not even a chance of this at current levels.

US Stocks

While US stocks remain at fairly elevated levels as compared to early October, they are showing signs of cooling off.  The S&P 500, the euro, and the Australian dollar have still not exceeded their October 27 highs.  From a technical perspective, this break in upward momentum is bound to be a bearish signal for traders.

Posted below is a chart of the AAII Bullish sentiment readings divided by Bearish sentiment readings, as well as a chart of just the Bearish readings.  These are surveys conducted with individual investors on a weekly basis.

As we reported 2 weeks ago, this index is very useful as a contrarian indicator.  2 weeks ago, this index was at 1.72, meaning 1.72 bulls for every bear.  The index then promptly lost 6% over the next 3 trading sessions.  Today, this index stands even higher at 1.82.

The last time the index was slanted this bullish was February 17th of this year.  As shown by the chart above, the S&P lost 7% almost immediately after this reading.  Also, the last 2 times there were this few bears in the survey (as denoted by the AAIIBear Index chart above) were on February 17th and July 7th.  The S&P posted losses of 7% and 19% very soon thereafter both of these readings.

While these are purely technical sentiment readings, they are indicative of the complacency in markets nowadays.  It seems as though individual investors as well as commodity investors have decided to largely ignore the macro risks for the time being and focus on the upside.

While the S&P 500 at large is trading at a fairly cheap 13.2x earnings, a deeper look into the market reveals a not so necessarily cheap market.  The Dow Jones US Financials Index is trading at around book value and 12x earnings, which is not all that cheap considering assets on banks’ balance sheets from the bubble years are still held at book value, not to mention the systemic risk of contagion from the European banking system.

The Nasdaq 100 is trading at a 16x P/E, which is low historically, but certainly does not sound all that low in a vacuum.  Especially considering that Apple makes up 14% of the index, and that Apple, the world’s largest company by market cap, trades at a premium multiple to the stock market at large, stocks do not look priced for a recession.

The energy services sector seems to be the most frothy.  The OSX is now trading at a 19.50 P/E, significantly above the 5x it traded for in the depths of 2008.  With WTI crude at 98 and Brent at 112, crude itself seems overpriced, and the services sector may be even more overpriced.  Both could endure swift falls in the case of renewed recession.

Trade Recommendation

Traders can take advantage of the implied to historical volatility disparity in the energy services sector.  We recommend purchasing the January 2012 119.1 put for $5.35 per contract.  With the current 30 day historical volatility at 51.26% and the implied volatility of this option at 44.62%, this option can be purchased at somewhat of a discount, given the assumption that recent volatility continues.

Crude Oil

WTI crude has gone on an amazing run since October 4th, rising an incredible 31.22%.  While this is somewhat in line with the rest of risk assets, crude has had an especially good run.  The last few days can most likely be chalked up to speculators buying due to a perceived geopolitical risk from Iranian hostility.  However, just as in the Arab Spring, these speculators will eventually need to liquidate, taking prices down significantly from current levels.

The following chart shows the price of crude in orange and the Managed Money net long position in white.

As can be seen, the managed money position has grown to a high level, in the 91st percentile of readings going back 5 years, with prices only in the 79th percentile.  This indicates a preponderance of speculators driving prices up.  If and when there is an easing of geopolitical tensions and/or signs of economic slowdown, speculators could exit the crude market very quickly, driving prices near recent lows around $75/barrel.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend shorting crude oil futures at a price of $98.50 or better.  A stop could be placed at the $100 level or just above, as this is psychological support/resistance.

 

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

Weekly Commodity Market Update – Metals Running, Ceiling on Crude

Posted July 12th, 2011 in Commodities, Copper, Crude Oil by Tom
This post is featured from The Commodity Analyst newsletter.  Originally sent to subscribers over the weekend, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  For details and samples of the newsletter, see here: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

This Week In Commodities

This past week saw a rise in commodity prices across the board, accompanied by rising stock and US dollar exchange rates.  Renewed faith in the US economic recovery was tempered by Friday’s extremely weak June jobs report, but as the rest of this month’s corporate earnings play out, the way forward should become clearer.

Even though the dollar rose last week, silver and gold enjoyed great weeks.  Gold had its best week since November 2009, and silver rose a solid 8.4% on the week.  As we have surmised many times in the past, it seems that precious metals are now undertaking a positive correlation with the US dollar, as the dollar reigns supreme among major currencies in today’s uncertain economic landscape, and investors continue to diversify away from all paper currencies, not just the dollar, into precious metals.

Posted below is a chart of the CRB Raw Industrial Index and the S&P GSCI Total Return Index.



As can be seen, both indices enjoyed rallies this week.  This is encouraging from a commodity demand standpoint, as it indicates that prices for speculative commodities are rising in tandem with industrial ones.  While the Raw Industrials have indicated some weakness for the past couple months, they have largely stabilized, and appear ready to move forward.

We believe the world remains in a tepid economic recovery, although certain commodities will be much larger beneficiaries than others.  Let’s begin our analysis with copper.

Copper

Copper is an interesting commodity, as it revolves around many of today’s headline risk factors.  Most of the world’s copper demand comes from a single country, China.  With China arguably in a real estate bubble, and simultaneously trying to aggressively control inflation by tightening monetary policy, it would seem that copper would have fallen out of favor with traders.  The data indicates that this has largely been the case.  The chart below shows the price of copper in white and the Managed Money net long position in amber.

As can be seen, copper traders essentially left the metal for dead during the recent stock market woes of May and June.  However, what is very interesting is that while the price of the metal fell, it actually held up fairly well.  With the Managed Money net long position falling to levels not seen since the metal was trading below $3 back in June 2010, copper held the $4 level with conviction.

The past week saw a surge in net longs in copper, and with it a nice rise of around 5%.  However, we believe that the metal could easily retake its previous high of 4.63 set back in January and power to new heights with sustained interest from Managed Money.

Another reliable indicator to use for copper is the London Metal Exchange Warehouse Stocks Copper Index.  Essentially this index is tracking how much copper is in the LME warehouses.  Posted below is a chart of the index for the past 5 years, along with moving averages.

As can be seen, the index moves in fairly smooth trends.  The green boxes indicate turning points in which the inventories fell below their 50 day moving average.  The following chart shows the LSCA Index alongside copper prices.

As can be seen, each one of the previous 4 occurrences of this phenomenon have kicked off a major rally in copper prices.  This makes fundamental sense, as falling inventories on the LME indicate rising physical demand, which eventually leads to higher prices if the demand is sustained.  With all the negative headlines coming out of China, it is interesting that the inventories are falling once again in spite of the tightening efforts by the Chinese government.  It is our opinion that copper will continue to rally in the face of negative headlines, and take out the old all-time high.

Trade Recommendation
We recommend purchasing copper futures at a price of 4.4000 or better with a target of at least 4.63.  A similar trade could be effected by purchasing shares in FCX, a great proxy for copper prices and a well-run company.

Crude Oil

The crude market continues to be tugged in multiple directions.  Seemingly alternating days there is an economic recovery rally in crude oil, only for it to fall back on worse than expected economic data.  Masquerading among this “risk-on, risk-off” volatility is the supply/demand fundamentals surrounding crude oil.

Posted below is a chart of crude vs. Managed Money net long positions.

As can be seen, the entire upward move in crude during the Middle East unrest period beginning in February was due to increased speculative activity (a point we have driven home numerous times).  At present, the speculative interest has fallen to more reasonable levels, but remains considerably elevated.  We believe the risk in crude is absolutely to the downside, with upside moves being tempered by a host of reasons.

The first reason that crude has more downside than upside is that the recent data has shown that speculators need to be the primary driver for crude to go higher.  With the unexpected release of oil from the strategic reserves breaking speculators’ backs, speculators will be wary of bidding up the price of oil beyond $100/barrel.  The most important point from the strategic draw was that it was a multilateral decision, not just a US one.  This indicates that many governments are on board with keeping oil prices in check.

Secondly, in keeping with the above theme, OPEC also does not want $100/barrel oil.  As we have discussed before, OPEC would like the price of oil somewhere in the $70-90 range.  This is because that price range offers OPEC producers a very healthy profit margin, but also keeps US alternative energy vigilantes sidelined.  With the cost of gasoline at a reasonable level, the environmental buffs do not have nearly as much sympathy from the US population, and consequently Capitol Hill.  OPEC knows that, in the long run, having the US devote sustained resources to alternative energy research spells certain doom for them.  This is why they would much rather quietly collect their profits instead of risk the wrath of US voters turning hostile towards gasoline forever.  They know that the oil age will come to an end eventually, and they have no interest in quickening the pace.

The third reason that crude has a fairly hard ceiling is that the cure for higher prices is simply higher prices.  In the US, drivers simply stop driving or curtail driving activity to a minimum if gasoline prices rise too far.  This causes demand to fall, which in turn causes prices to fall back to equilibrium.  To make matters even more efficient is that gasoline prices are reset on a daily basis, so drivers adjust their behavior to price very quickly.

The US cannot support $150/barrel oil.  If the cost of oil were to rise 50% from current levels, a view championed by the cover story of Barron’s last week, US drivers would drastically cut back their activity and the most popular political topic would shift from the national debt to foreign oil independence.  It is in the best interest of numerous active, interested, and controlling parties for this not to happen.  While the supply constraints of crude have been well-noted, we believe the demand side of the story to be more palatable and measurable.  Barron’s belief that Saudi supply is already at max level is nothing more than a guess based on some offhand commentary.

Trade Recommendation

In order to profit from a perceived ceiling on crude oil prices, we recommend selling the September 104 calls for 0.98, or $980 per contract.  This trade would be profitable as long as September delivery crude does not close above 104.98 on August 17th, a little over a month from now.  This is an aggressive trade, as crude would only have to rally about 8% from current levels for this call to be in the money, but we view the upside on crude oil to be limited for all the aforementioned reasons.  We would view a rally in crude as an opportunity to sell more calls, possibly for longer maturities and higher strike prices.In order to effect this trade using the USO, an investor could sell the USO August 41 calls for ~$0.38.

 

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

 

Comments Off

Upside for Copper, Downside for Natural Gas?

Posted May 25th, 2011 in Commodities, Copper, Natual Gas by Tom
This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The Commodity Analyst.  Originally sent to subscribers May 22nd, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  If you would like to see samples of the newsletter or subscribe to have it delivered each weekend in addition to ad-hoc trading recommendations mid-week, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

This past week saw a stabilization in commodity prices, with the S&P GSCI Total Return Index logging its 2nd straight week of gains after the huge 11% drop 3 weeks ago.

Posted below are charts of the CRB Raw Industrial Index and the GSCI Total Return Index.

CRB Raw Industrial Index Chart

GSCI Total Return Index Chart

As can be seen, both indices have stabilized in the past week and gained slightly after their severe correction earlier this month. We believe that the drop was nothing more than a correction in an ongoing bull market.

The weekly moves of the indices are in line with an ongoing bull market. After the big drop, commodities are grinding their way higher with slow, gradual gains. This is exactly the type of action one would like to see in a bull market, with sudden pullbacks and grinding gains.

However, some commodities are better positioned than others, and we continue to favor the industrial and precious metals sector over energy.

Let’s start with natural gas.

Natural Gas

Natural gas has remained an incredibly depressed market due to massive oversupply and abundant domestic production. The problem for natural gas producers is that is simply too cheap to drill for natural gas domestically. With the cheapest producers profitable down to even $3 and in some cases less, there is little incentive for natural gas producers to shutter production even though prices remain almost 75% lower than they were at the peak in 2008. The Commitment of Traders data posted below reflects this situation.

Natural Gas Managed Money Net Long Net Producer Short Chart

The chart shows the price of natural gas in amber, the net Producer position in green and the net Managed Money position in white. Note that both the Producer and Managed Money position are negative, so the lower on the chart they are, the more short contracts these groups hold.

As can be seen, Producer short remain among the highest in the last 4 years, even though prices remain very depressed. We believe the preponderance of Producer shorts indicates that Producers are highly willing to hedge at current prices, and are giving up on the hopes of a further rally to lock in higher prices.

Also interesting is that Managed Money net positions are actually on the high side of the range they have been in over the last 2 years since the bubble burst. This indicates that renewed Managed Money shorting could push natural gas prices significantly lower.

With cost of production of natural gas very low, and with new fields being found every day, the outlook for the natural gas market is at best neutral and at worst highly bearish.  With that in mind, we have formed our trade recommendation.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend selling call options on natural gas between the 4.6-5 level over the next 2 months. The July 4.65 calls could be sold for 0.065, or $650 per contract. Such a position would be profitable as long as natural gas is below 4.65 on June 25th, or 10% above current levels.

A similar trade could be executed by selling the June 11 calls on UNG. While we normally do not recommend using the UNG to express views on natural gas, if views are bearish, then shorting the UNG should actually be a relatively attractive option given the bearish disposition to the ETF.

Copper

Copper has taken a large hit as of late, falling 13% from its peak of 4.65 on February 15th to 4.05 today. We believe that despite the pullback, copper remains attractive going forward due to Chinese and emerging market expansion.

Shown below is a chart of copper futures and aggregate open interest.

Copper Aggregated Open Interest Chart

As can be seen, open interest on copper futures has taken a dive since prices peaked, and is now at the lowest level since 2009. With Chinese tightening measures and efforts to cool real estate speculation, the mood in the copper market has become decidedly bearish. Shown below is a chart of copper in white and Managed Money longs in amber.

Copper Managed Money Net Long Chart

Futures traders sentiment has dove to almost net short levels, with the Managed Money long interest at only 3,745 net long contracts. This is also the lowest Managed Money net long position since the large pullback of summer 2010.

Also interesting is that while copper prices have pulled back, it seems that prices have not been as sensitive to Managed Money bailing as in the past. Shown below is a chart of Producer net shorts.

Copper Producer Short Charts

As can be seen, Producers were at their most net short in January of 2010 and again in January 2011, very close to medium term peaks in the copper market. It seems that Producers are timing the market well, as they greatly reduced their net short position in the summer of 2010 when prices were at their lowest as well. The net short position currently stands at the same level it did in the summer of 2010 before copper experienced a 60% rally.

The inventories of copper on the London Metal Exchange have also been a good indicator of medium term buying opportunities in copper. Shown below is a 5 year chart of copper prices on bottom and copper inventories on top.

Copper Inventory Chart

As can be seen, peaks in the copper inventories correspond well to copper market bottoms, and present great buying opportunities. Shown below is a 1 year chart of inventories.

Copper Inventories 1 Year Chart

Inventories appear to be topping out, and if they start to turn decidedly down, the bull thesis on copper will only grow louder.

Fundamentals
While copper bears point to tightening out of China as the primary reason for not wanting to own copper, we view it as a long-term bullish development. Governments only tighten monetary policy when growth is very good, and they never do so to such an extent that they choke growth. The point is to slightly tame inflation, which it appears they have accomplished for the time being.

Furthermore, all the recent tightening actually gives the Chinese government more room to encourage growth long-term. If there is any hiccup in growth, all the Chinese central bank has to do is decrease reserve requirements or drop interest rates, and both have quite a ways to drop with how vigilant China has been in raising them. Contrast this situation to the US where the Federal Reserve has extremely limited options to promote growth, with interest rates already at zero percent and quantitative easing becoming more and more politically untenable. We believe China, as well as the rest of the emerging markets, will continue to grow and tighten monetary policy, but not to the extent where growth is compromised.

As long as we do not re-enter recession, copper should remain a coveted commodity. Construction and growth in emerging markets should keep supplies tight and prices supported.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend the purchase of copper futures at a price of 4.05 or better. Such a position entails significant risk from the possibility of copper experiencing temporary weakness on bearish headlines out of Europe and/or severe US dollar strengthening, but we believe the time has come to begin building a bullish position in the metal.

Alternatively, one could buy stock or calls on FCX. FCX is trading more than 20% off its peak and is trading at only 9.3x trailing 12 months earnings. We think the stock is cheap even just going off of fundamentals, but it will also experience a serious boost if copper prices begin to rebound.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.