Comments Off

Weekly Market Update – No QE3 For The Foreseeable Future

Posted December 21st, 2011 in Equities, Forex, Gold, Natual Gas by debojit

This post is featured from The Commodity Analyst newsletter.  Originally sent to subscribers Monday December 20, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  For details and samples of the newsletter, see here: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

The past week saw an increase in risk aversion, with stocks, commodities and the euro all dropping on the week.  A fading of optimism surrounding the latest EU meeting was evident, but risk assets accelerated to the downside after the Fed indicated that no new stimulus is forthcoming.  On Tuesday, stock and commodity markets were comfortably ahead on the day, but then turned solidly negative in the 2 hours after the FOMC statement was released.

It appears that once again the market is desperately awaiting renewed quantitative easing.  Especially given how (relatively) good US economic data has been recently, we were very surprised to see the market react so negatively to what was largely anticipated to be a mum FOMC statement.  Commodities, especially gold, silver and WTI crude, took it on the chin the remainder of the week as reasons for holding commodities as an inflation/monetary debasement hedge appear to far-fetched at the moment.  We continue to expect no QE3 from the Fed for the foreseeable future, or at least not until Europe has already caused asset prices to fall much further from current levels.  The FOMC’s decidedly more positive language regarding the trajectory of the economy, and the sole dissenter arguing for more easing indicates that the FOMC is moving farther and farther away from increasing the size of the Fed balance sheet.  As a result, we expect commodities to continue to decline, especially precious metals.

The following charts show the CRB Raw Industrial index as well as the GSCI Total Return index.

For the week, the GSCI index fell 4.6%, and the CRB RIND fell 2.3%.  While this does not sound like much for the CRB RIND, this is quite a big weekly move for it, and should be cause for concern.  The last time we saw such an aggressive decline was the week of the September FOMC meeting, which coincided with a 130 point drop on the S&P 500 within 2 weeks.

The market is beginning to understand that US stimulus to bail the world out of European problems.  In addition to the Fed standing pat, top Republicans as well as President Obama himself indicated that the US would not lend to the IMF in order to bail out Europe.  The powers that be in this country have decided that it is time to hunker down and focus on our own economy, and further debasement of the monetary supply will not be tolerated.  As can be imagined, this poses a huge problem for precious metals bulls.

Gold

Gold was the headline mover of the week, dropping almost 7%.  Longtime readers of The Commodity Analyst know that we have been bearish on gold for quite some time, but even we were surprised by this week’s move.  Nevertheless, we see further downside for both.

The following chart shows the price of gold in yellow and Managed Money net longs in blue.

While Managed Money interest is certainly not extremely high, it is also not necessarily very low.  While Managed Money longs most likely dropped a good amount after Tuesday (when the CFTC report is accurate until), gold Managed Money longs are nowhere near the lows seen in 2008 when the metal fell and washed out many weak long holders before moving higher.   Furthermore, the red trendline of gold’s uptrend since 2008 appears to be on the verge of being broken.  This upcoming week could be critical for the price of gold.

The following chart shows the price of gold in on OHLC bar chart.

From a simple technical standpoint, we can see that gold has made consistently lower highs since peaking in September.  Gold is also significantly below both the 150 day and 200 day moving averages, levels that served as ironclad support for the past 3 years.

Even more critical, gold is now within striking distance of the intraday low put in by gold on September 26th.  That day, gold opened lower on the Sunday night electronic session after margin requirements were raised the previous Friday.  The selling quickly cascaded, taking gold down over $100 intraday by 2:45 am EST, or the middle of the European trading day.  However, gold then rallied just as strongly as it fell, ending up finishing the day down only $10 from Friday’s close, and going on to rally to 1700 within weeks and 1800 within a couple months.  This type of intraday fall and recovery was also seen on August 25th, which precipitated another move higher.  These moves are in contrast to gold’s fall over the past few days.

While Friday saw gold briefly retake the $1600 level, it has yet to have a large intraday price spike downwards accompanied by buyers stepping in en masse to support the metal.  We believe if gold breaks below 1560 initially, and then critically at 1535-1530, it could easily fall to 1475 and possibly 1300 in a hurry.  Considering prices were at 1300 as recently as January, continued selling pressure in the equity markets would put heavy pressure on managers to liquidate the one asset that has actually gained in 2011, gold.  With prices still up 12.5% on the year, managers are highly likely to sell into gold’s weakness, as its chart looks very poor, and its high degree of liquidity providing quick cash.

Another large factor to consider is both wide retail ownership of gold, as well as John Paulson’s outsized GLD holdings.  The following table shows the top holders of GLD, and the chart shows total number of ounces of gold held by exchange-traded products.

As can be seen, John Paulson’s funds continue to hold over 20 million shares of GLD, or almost 5% of the entire fund.  This is especially problematic, as Paulson’s poor performance this year (his main funds are down 30-50% year to date) will most likely lead to redemptions.  As Paulson needs to raise liquidity, he will probably reach for the one asset he can sell at a gain, gold.  Given that Paulson’s remaining GLD holdings comprise quite a bit more than one full day’s average volume of GLD shares traded, heavy divestment of GLD by Paulson could singlehandedly cause gold to fall an additional 5-10%.

Additionally, retail investors have become extremely enamored with gold over the past 5 years.  The chart above shows that exchange-traded funds’ holdings of gold have skyrocketed from 20mm ounces in 2007 to over 75mm ounces today.  Of course this number does not incorporate all the physical holders of gold who were seduced by Monex.com and other endless television advertisements for the “next big investment.”  If and when gold prices continue to move lower, a good deal of panic selling by retail investors could easily ensue, especially if equity markets move lower.  Gold has fooled most every retail investor into thinking that it is a safe haven asset, so if gold actually moves lower with force, it could face waves of selling by panicked retail investors who are now simultaneously losing on stocks as well as their false security blanket, gold.

For all these reasons, it is critical for gold bulls that gold at least break downward momentum and stabilize at current levels immediately.  Just a 4% loss from current levels could lead to significantly lower prices in a hurry, with $1300 as a perfectly reasonable target.

Also, despite numerous goldbugs recently claiming that the current fall in prices presents a good buying opportunity in order for gold to climb a “wall of worry,” implied volatility data indicates the opposite.  The following chart shows the GVZ, which is the gold VIX.  It measures the implied volatility on GLD options.

As can be seen, gold volatility is actually near a 4 month low at present levels.  By contrast, the last time gold traded near these prices, the GVZ was well above 40.  To us, this indicates complacency on the part of gold bulls, which is not at all indicative of a market climbing a wall of worry.  Furthermore, the relatively low implied volatility presents very good opportunities for bearish traders to enter positions.

Trade Recommendation

With implied volatility this low and with gold bulls claiming that this is yet another short-term blip, buying put options on gold to speculate on lower prices seems like a highly attractive risk/reward trade.  The $1400 put option expiring on January 26th, 2012 can be purchased for $6.10.  This trade would be profitable if gold closes below $1393.90 on January 26th.

While this is a low strike price, we believe a decline to or below these prices is fully within the realm of possibility.  Furthermore, we believe that a deeper decline will most likely materialize soon if it is in fact in the cards, so purchasing these options with an eye towards reselling them upon further price weakness seems like a highly attractive proposition.   Conservative traders could cut their losses if this option loses half its value.

Natural Gas

We indicated last week that we have turned bullish on the price of natural gas.  While we remain bullish on a slightly longer timeframe (2-3 months), we see a high possibility of significantly lower prices in the near future.

For the past 2 weeks, natural gas storage numbers have turned in decidedly bullish readings, yet prices have failed to stabilize.  2 weeks ago, the draw was expected at -12, but came in at -20, and this week the draw was expected at -92 but came in at -102.  In both cases, prices initially rallied, but quickly lost steam throughout the rest of the trading session.  We believe this action belies significantly weaker prices in the near future, although that could be very short-lived.

With last week’s break below 3.20, front month natural gas is now at its lowest point since September 2009 when it hit 2.50.  To be sure, a natural gas price of at or near $3 is frankly ridiculous, as cost of production for most producers in $4 or higher, so production must eventually be turned off.  However, epidemic bearishness for natural gas has sprung from cheaply productive shale plays, as well as warmer than expected weather on the US east coast.  While speculators are at least partly to blame, Managed Money data indicates that traders are not nearly as short as we would think given how low prices have fallen.  The following chart shows natural gas net longs in white and the price of natural gas in orange.

While the correlation between extreme highs and lows in natural gas prices is clearly not great with Managed Money net interest, it is concerning that Managed Money has actually covered 30k net short contracts recently with no positive effect on natural gas prices.

We believe that a break below $3 would have speculators jumping on natural gas to the short side, possibly bringing prices down to the $2.50 level quickly to challenge the September 2009 low.  However, we advise building bullish exposure to natural gas even if prices were to fall to this level, as this is an unsustainably low price.  As the winter inevitably turns colder on the east coast, and prices rally at all, traders will jump back on natural gas to the upside as quickly as they did the downside.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend building a short put position on natural gas at the $3 strike price for 2-4 months out.  At current prices, the $3 put expiring on January 26th can be sold for 0.11, or $1100 per contract.  This trade would be profitable as long as natural gas closes above $2.89 on January 26th.  Given that the February contract is currently trading at 3.174, this trade would be profitable as long as nat gas does not decline an additional 9% in the next 6 weeks.  Given the possible continued move lower in natural gas, we recommend scaling into this position, perhaps by the desired total position size in thirds over the next 2 weeks.

US Stocks

We continue to view US stocks with an extremely bearish disposition due to their stubborn strength as of late even in the face of certain recession in Europe.  While equity market investors continue to remain optimistic that somehow the US can escape the slowdown occurring in emerging markets and Europe, we believe US stocks will eventually succumb to the same forces, with corporate earnings in the US coming in nowhere near current 2012 expectations.  Additionally, volatility as measured by the VIX is extremely low in our view considering the likely pitfalls that lie ahead.

The following chart shows the VIX index.

As can be seen, the VIX is now at levels not seen since June and July, when most investors were completely unaware of Europe’s problems.  Just as with gold, we believe this low level of volatility indicates a very high level of complacency among equity bulls.  In contrast to October’s powerful rally when the VIX remained above 30 almost the entire way up until the peak on October 27th, the VIX is now 50% lower than its level reached on August 8th, the day after the US lost its AAA credit rating.

With the massive deleveraging yet to come out of Europe combined with decimated European economic activity due to austerity, we believe there is much more risk than reward possible from equities at current prices.  We believe the current complacency in the equity options market presents an ideal opportunity to both hedge long stock exposure, as well as speculate on further downside.

Trade Recommendation

Equity investors’ lack of fear makes the purchase of put options an intriguing play.  Specifically, the SPX 900 puts expiring March 17th 2012 can be purchased for $6.  Such a trade would be profitable if the S&P 500 were to decline to 894, or 26.6% from current levels.  While this is a large downwards move in equity prices, we believe that European deleveraging coupled with a soured view on US economics could easily take us to such levels.  Furthermore, a smaller decline occurring in the near term coupled with an increase in the VIX would make for a highly profitable exit of this trade before expiration.  Given that this same option traded for $50 on August 8th, upside could be quite substantial in the event of further equity market turmoil.

Investors can also look at purchasing the 1000-900 SPX put spread expiring June 16th, 2012 for $13.15.  Such a trade would entail risking $1,315 per contract for a possible profit of $8,685, or 660% on invested capital.  The trade would reach maximum profitability if the S&P 500 declined to 900 on June 26th, or 26% from current levels.  Again, this trade requires a significant downwards move to reach peak profitability, but could also be exited if near-term equity market weakness increases volatility.

Aggressive traders can also look to purchase futures directly on the VIX index.  The front month futures contract expiring December 20th is trading at 26.10.  This contract could  be purchased in the hopes of the VIX rising this week, but exposure could also be rolled to the January contract if such hopes fail to materialize.  With the VIX January futures currently trading at a 4 point premium to the spot VIX index, investors should be careful, but we believe that any spike in the VIX should take it well above the 30 level, making such a trade profitable.

 

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

Weekly Commodity Market Update Featuring Natural Gas

Posted June 16th, 2011 in Commodities, Natual Gas by Tom
This post is featured from The Commodity Analyst newsletter.  Originally sent to subscribers over the weekend, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  For details and samples of the newsletter, see here: http://realfinancenewsletter.com


This Week In Commodities

This week saw continued selling in US equities, although commodity prices remained strong for the most part.  Continued uncertainty over the Greek debt situation caused the US dollar to strengthen slightly, but the commodity market appears to be factoring in that global growth will not be affected by the European debt crisis.

The CRB Raw Industrial Index appears to be scraping along the bottom, while the S&P GSCI Total Return Index is experiencing good support from the 100 day moving average.  We view the trends in both these indices as confirming commodities future attractiveness.

CRB Raw Industrial Index Chart

S&P GSCI Total Return Index Chart

This week, we will be examining natural gas in detail…

Natural Gas

The natural gas market experienced a small gain for the week, but we believe the current rally will prove to be short-lived.  The following chart shows the price of natural gas in amber, Managed Money net longs in white, and Producer net shorts in green.

Natural Gas Managed Money Long Chart

Astonishingly, Managed Money has become net long for the first time since 2007.  Given that natural gas market fundamentals remain neutral to bearish, this is very surprising.  Natural gas speculators have covered 200,000 short contracts in the past 3 months.  In the same time span, front month natural gas futures are up 18.56%.  While that is not a small gain, it is interesting that natural gas prices have not advanced more in the face of such huge buying pressure.  The reason why is that natural gas producers are selling fervently.

Producer net short positions advanced to an all-time record of around 75k net short contracts.  This willingness to hedge at current prices indicates how low the cost of production of natural gas is.  Many producers are profitable down to the 3-3.5 range, with some producers possibly profitable even below 3.  With cost of production so low, and with so much new production coming online every day, producers are very willing to hedge on any rally to the 5 level.  The 5-6 range has proven to be very hard resistance for natural gas since the bubble burst back in 2008.  With producer selling placing an effective hard ceiling on prices, we recommend bearish exposure.

Trade Recommendation
With the short position on natural gas being covered, the fuel of short covering has been removed from the bull scenario for natural gas.  We believe that renewed selling by speculators could cause a large decline in prices if and when the short term trend turns south. 

We recommend selling the August 5.25 calls for .085, or $850 per contract.  This trade would be profitable as long as natural gas is below 5.25, or 10.3% higher, at the end of July.  With the psychologically important 5 level looming as resistance, we do not believe that natural gas could sustain a rally above 5, if it can even attain that level.  More aggressive traders could also short natural gas futures contracts directly, although this is a risky trade that should be monitored closely.

 

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

 

Comments Off

Upside for Copper, Downside for Natural Gas?

Posted May 25th, 2011 in Commodities, Copper, Natual Gas by Tom
This post is from a series of featured articles pulled from a newsletter we are helping launch, The Commodity Analyst.  Originally sent to subscribers May 22nd, we are sharing portions of the content a few days delayed here.  If you would like to see samples of the newsletter or subscribe to have it delivered each weekend in addition to ad-hoc trading recommendations mid-week, see here to sign up: http://realfinancenewsletter.com

This past week saw a stabilization in commodity prices, with the S&P GSCI Total Return Index logging its 2nd straight week of gains after the huge 11% drop 3 weeks ago.

Posted below are charts of the CRB Raw Industrial Index and the GSCI Total Return Index.

CRB Raw Industrial Index Chart

GSCI Total Return Index Chart

As can be seen, both indices have stabilized in the past week and gained slightly after their severe correction earlier this month. We believe that the drop was nothing more than a correction in an ongoing bull market.

The weekly moves of the indices are in line with an ongoing bull market. After the big drop, commodities are grinding their way higher with slow, gradual gains. This is exactly the type of action one would like to see in a bull market, with sudden pullbacks and grinding gains.

However, some commodities are better positioned than others, and we continue to favor the industrial and precious metals sector over energy.

Let’s start with natural gas.

Natural Gas

Natural gas has remained an incredibly depressed market due to massive oversupply and abundant domestic production. The problem for natural gas producers is that is simply too cheap to drill for natural gas domestically. With the cheapest producers profitable down to even $3 and in some cases less, there is little incentive for natural gas producers to shutter production even though prices remain almost 75% lower than they were at the peak in 2008. The Commitment of Traders data posted below reflects this situation.

Natural Gas Managed Money Net Long Net Producer Short Chart

The chart shows the price of natural gas in amber, the net Producer position in green and the net Managed Money position in white. Note that both the Producer and Managed Money position are negative, so the lower on the chart they are, the more short contracts these groups hold.

As can be seen, Producer short remain among the highest in the last 4 years, even though prices remain very depressed. We believe the preponderance of Producer shorts indicates that Producers are highly willing to hedge at current prices, and are giving up on the hopes of a further rally to lock in higher prices.

Also interesting is that Managed Money net positions are actually on the high side of the range they have been in over the last 2 years since the bubble burst. This indicates that renewed Managed Money shorting could push natural gas prices significantly lower.

With cost of production of natural gas very low, and with new fields being found every day, the outlook for the natural gas market is at best neutral and at worst highly bearish.  With that in mind, we have formed our trade recommendation.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend selling call options on natural gas between the 4.6-5 level over the next 2 months. The July 4.65 calls could be sold for 0.065, or $650 per contract. Such a position would be profitable as long as natural gas is below 4.65 on June 25th, or 10% above current levels.

A similar trade could be executed by selling the June 11 calls on UNG. While we normally do not recommend using the UNG to express views on natural gas, if views are bearish, then shorting the UNG should actually be a relatively attractive option given the bearish disposition to the ETF.

Copper

Copper has taken a large hit as of late, falling 13% from its peak of 4.65 on February 15th to 4.05 today. We believe that despite the pullback, copper remains attractive going forward due to Chinese and emerging market expansion.

Shown below is a chart of copper futures and aggregate open interest.

Copper Aggregated Open Interest Chart

As can be seen, open interest on copper futures has taken a dive since prices peaked, and is now at the lowest level since 2009. With Chinese tightening measures and efforts to cool real estate speculation, the mood in the copper market has become decidedly bearish. Shown below is a chart of copper in white and Managed Money longs in amber.

Copper Managed Money Net Long Chart

Futures traders sentiment has dove to almost net short levels, with the Managed Money long interest at only 3,745 net long contracts. This is also the lowest Managed Money net long position since the large pullback of summer 2010.

Also interesting is that while copper prices have pulled back, it seems that prices have not been as sensitive to Managed Money bailing as in the past. Shown below is a chart of Producer net shorts.

Copper Producer Short Charts

As can be seen, Producers were at their most net short in January of 2010 and again in January 2011, very close to medium term peaks in the copper market. It seems that Producers are timing the market well, as they greatly reduced their net short position in the summer of 2010 when prices were at their lowest as well. The net short position currently stands at the same level it did in the summer of 2010 before copper experienced a 60% rally.

The inventories of copper on the London Metal Exchange have also been a good indicator of medium term buying opportunities in copper. Shown below is a 5 year chart of copper prices on bottom and copper inventories on top.

Copper Inventory Chart

As can be seen, peaks in the copper inventories correspond well to copper market bottoms, and present great buying opportunities. Shown below is a 1 year chart of inventories.

Copper Inventories 1 Year Chart

Inventories appear to be topping out, and if they start to turn decidedly down, the bull thesis on copper will only grow louder.

Fundamentals
While copper bears point to tightening out of China as the primary reason for not wanting to own copper, we view it as a long-term bullish development. Governments only tighten monetary policy when growth is very good, and they never do so to such an extent that they choke growth. The point is to slightly tame inflation, which it appears they have accomplished for the time being.

Furthermore, all the recent tightening actually gives the Chinese government more room to encourage growth long-term. If there is any hiccup in growth, all the Chinese central bank has to do is decrease reserve requirements or drop interest rates, and both have quite a ways to drop with how vigilant China has been in raising them. Contrast this situation to the US where the Federal Reserve has extremely limited options to promote growth, with interest rates already at zero percent and quantitative easing becoming more and more politically untenable. We believe China, as well as the rest of the emerging markets, will continue to grow and tighten monetary policy, but not to the extent where growth is compromised.

As long as we do not re-enter recession, copper should remain a coveted commodity. Construction and growth in emerging markets should keep supplies tight and prices supported.

Trade Recommendation

We recommend the purchase of copper futures at a price of 4.05 or better. Such a position entails significant risk from the possibility of copper experiencing temporary weakness on bearish headlines out of Europe and/or severe US dollar strengthening, but we believe the time has come to begin building a bullish position in the metal.

Alternatively, one could buy stock or calls on FCX. FCX is trading more than 20% off its peak and is trading at only 9.3x trailing 12 months earnings. We think the stock is cheap even just going off of fundamentals, but it will also experience a serious boost if copper prices begin to rebound.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

 

Comments Off

Energy Outlook: Natural Gas Options Opportunity

Posted April 14th, 2011 in Commodities, Natual Gas by Tom

Posted April 14, 2011

Below find a featured post from a newsletter we are helping launch – The RealFinance Commodity Analyst – for more info, see here: RealFinance Investor Newsletters.

Recent activity in energy markets has obviously been influenced heavily by unrest in the Middle East and North Africa. For the year, West Texas Intermediate crude oil is up 20.75%, while the more internationally-influenced Brent Crude is up an astounding 33.36%.

However, in the same period Henry Hub natural gas is down 8.86%. One futures contract worth of natural gas (1 mmbtu) should have about one-fifth the energy content of one contract worth of crude oil (1,000 barrels). It follows that in a normally functioning, perfectly efficient energy market, crude oil should be about five times more expensive than natural gas. However, with natural gas at 4.04 and WTI crude at 112.79, this ratio currently stands at an incredible 27 times.

In the past, we have discussed the extremity of such a ratio as being a catalyst for either a fall in crude oil prices, a rise in natural gas prices, or both. Unfortunately for natural gas, such is not the case today.

The following chart shows natural gas managed money net shorts against the price of natural gas.

Graph-Natural Gas Price vs Managed Money Long Chart

Since 3/1/11, managed money net shorts have decreased 53%. However, in the same period, the price of natural gas has increased by only 0.5%. To put this in perspective, this means that approximately 111,000 contracts of natural gas have been bought back by short sellers, but even that gargantuan amount of short-covering has only produced a 0.5% rise in the price of this commodity. Such a low price increase with such dramatic purchasing by managed money indicates that there must be another factor at play: producer selling.

The following chart shows the same elements as above, but overlayed with natural gas producer net shorts in green.

Graph-Natural Gas Price vs Managed Money Long vs Producer Short Chart

As can be seen, producer shorts have hit an all-time high (as producer chart is below zero, a further increase in short positions shows the line on the chart heading downwards). Practically, what this means is that Producers of natural gas [i.e. the Chesapeake Energy (CHK) and Exxon Mobils (XOM) of the world], are hedging their natural gas production at the fastest rate ever. The natural gas producers are incredibly eager to lock in prices between the 4-4.5 level. While this seems downright insane considering that natural gas was above 10 just 3 years ago, the amount of new natural gas production coming online each day is huge.

The fact that prices are already at $4 with natural gas managed money shorts hovering around 2-year lows means that renewed managed money selling could drive prices significantly lower than where they are today. Cheap domestic natural gas drilling has made some Producers profitable down to prices of even $3 per mmbtu or even lower in some cases, so these Producers will keep drilling even if prices continue to head south. Rather than shut down production and wait for better prices, natural gas producers are ramping up production and selling futures contracts heavily in order to lock in prices.

Trade Recommendation

The extreme willingness of producers to sell natural gas at these prices yields a very attractive risk/reward trade. We recommend selling calls above natural gas’ recent high of 4.48. Such a trade would entail selling the June 4.5 calls for .07, or $700, per contract. As long as natural gas closes below 4.5 on May 28 (9.6% higher than where it currently trades), the investor keeps all $700 per contract.
In order to effect the same trade using the UNG, investors could sell the May 12 calls for 0.13.

These trades carry the risk of selling uncovered calls. In the event of a large, unexpected rally in natural gas, investors could be left short natural gas in the face of a large rally. However, we would view any rally in natural gas as being short-lived due to the likelihood that producers will utilize any rally to increase long-term hedges. With natural gas producers this willing to sell at prices between 4-4.5, a sustained rally past 4.5 is highly unlikely. Furthermore, managed money will most likely begin to realize Producers’ predicament and start to increase their short positions again. Such a development could cause severe downside for natural gas, and cause a retest of the 3.5 level seen in late October 2010.

More aggressive traders may wish to short natural gas futures outright, or buy put options on natural gas futures. An intriguing trade could be to short or buy puts on the UNG instead of futures due to UNG’s documented underperformance of natural gas futures. short nat gas calls long nat gas puts.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Comments Off

Crude Oil to Natural Gas Ratio at Extreme Levels

Posted February 24th, 2011 in Commodities, Crude Oil, Natual Gas by Ananthan

Posted on February 24, 2011

Due to the recent Middle East unrest, crude oil and natural gas have become even more dislocated. As of the time of this writing, crude oil is trading around $99/barrel, while natural gas is trading at $3.842/mmbtu

From a strictly scientific standpoint, 1 barrel of crude oil should cost about 5.8 times 1 mmbtu of natural gas, because 1 barrel of crude oil has 5.8x as much energy content as 1 mmbtu of natural gas. However, for various reasons, this ratio does not hold true. The natural gas lobby in Washington is not very popular, so even though the US could be thought of as the “Saudi Arabia of Natural Gas,” our country does not really support it for political reasons. Instead, our politicians support coal and continued oil usage, while publicly claiming they want to end our dependence on foreign oil. If there was real initiative, the US could be completely energy independent, but this digresses from our real goal: analyzing macroeconomic trends to make sound investments.

The Crude Oil Natural Gas Ratio

The below chart shows the ratio of crude oil to natural gas in white, and the price of natural gas in amber.

Crude to Natural Gas Ratio Chart

As can be seen, aside from a brief return to reality in late 2008, from about mid-2007 onwards, the ratio of crude oil to natural gas has been extremely high. Natural gas is pretty much the only commodity in the world that has not recovered since the 2008 financial crisis, and it trades at about the same levels it traded at in 2002.

A large reason for crude oil’s outperformance is due to the global nature of the crude oil market vs. the domestic natural gas market. Since crude oil is a much more international market, it receives the same bid that precious metals receive as an inflation hedge. This phenomenon can be seen when considering that institutional investors typically allocate 1% of their portfolios to crude oil, but none to natural gas.

The last time the ratio was this high was September 2009, and natural gas proceeded to rally 138% until the end of 2009. While much of this was due to the front month expiration and contango in the natural gas curve, one still could have made 68% being long the front month contract and rolling it over each month.

Historical Comparison

Historical Crude to Natural Gas Ratio Chart

The chart above shows statistics on the ratio between natural gas and crude oil over the last 21 years. As can be seen, the highest ratio seen was 26.35 in late August 2009. The ratio as it currently stands is 26.11.

Additionally, the current reading is in the 99.82nd percentile of readings over the last 21 years, meaning that it is almost the highest reading ever seen. Considering that the median reading was 9.02, the current ratio stands almost 200% higher than the median.

CFTC Commitment of Traders Report

The chart below shows the Managed Money net short position over the last 5 years.

Managed Money Net Short Natural Gas Chart

As can be seen, the amount of net shorts from Managed Money has increased drastically in the past month to a current reading of 173,434 net short contracts. This reading is in the 5th percentile of readings over the last 5 years, and almost twice the median.

Because so many traders are short natural gas, any sustained rally off the bottom should trigger extensive short-covering. This would make a rally of 10-20% not out of the question.

Trade Recommendation

Usually when witnessing this large a disparity, I would recommend a trade to short the perceived overvalued commodity and go long the undervalued. However, because I believe in crude oil in the long-term for macro reasons, I would not recommend a short position in crude oil. Rather, I would recommend being long both, but with an overweight bias towards natural gas. Being short crude oil may provide a false sense of security as an inter-commodity spread hedge, but because the 2 commodities trade on entirely different rationales, this is not an appropriate trade.

Our recommendation is to sell puts on natural gas, as well as buy the futures contracts outright if you can stomach the volatility. Because natural gas is such a depressed and volatile commodity, put options on it are expensive, making their sale an attractive risk/reward scenario.

For example, the June 3.65 puts (expiring on May 25th) could be sold for $0.11, or $1,100 per contract. With June natural gas trading at $3.983, this means the trader would keep 100% of the premium collected as long as natural gas does not fall an additional 8.4% in the next 3 months. While 8.4% is by no means a huge cushion, considering natural gas has already fallen 14% for the year, we would think that a floor must be put into natural gas in the near future.

We continue to be short natural gas put options and long natural gas futures, and will add opportunistically on pullbacks.

ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN IS THE OPINION OF THE FIRM AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED INVESTMENT ADVICE. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.